Unintended Side Effects of Value Training in LLMs

arXiv:2610.29922 · cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-10-21 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-10-21

Updated: 2026-10-21

Comments: 37 pages, 31 figures, 26 tables

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

The gist: As LLMs are increasingly deployed in value-sensitive contexts, aligning them with human values has emerged as a post-training objective in NLP, aimed at instilling additional values and guiding model

Abstract

As LLMs are increasingly deployed in value-sensitive contexts, aligning them with human values has emerged as a post-training objective in NLP, aimed at instilling additional values and guiding model behaviour. However, current evaluations remain narrow. Because values are interconnected, it is unclear how fine-tuning for specific values alters unrelated capabilities and behaviours. In this work, we adapt four instruction-tuned LLMs across individual Hofstede's value dimensions and evaluate them on both cross-value transfer and broader behaviours. We find that value-specific training produces unintended side effects on untrained values, risk preferences, social cognition, and safety traits. Consequently, we suggest that value alignment after post-training should incorporate broader behavioral evaluations, and we highlight the need to investigate where additional value training might best fit into the pipeline.

Related papers