Monitorability Is Trainable: Post-Training for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability

arXiv:2610.29734 · cs.LG · Submitted 2026-10-21 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-10-21

Updated: 2026-10-21

Comments: The first two authors contributed equally

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is one of the few practical tools available for overseeing capable AI systems, but it is fragile: a model's reasoning is only useful to a monitor if it remains

Abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is one of the few practical tools available for overseeing capable AI systems, but it is fragile: a model's reasoning is only useful to a monitor if it remains coupled to what the model actually does. This coupling can be degraded during training through, for example, CoT compression, optimization against a monitor, and out-of-context generalization from synthetic documents. In this work, we propose an unsupervised post-training objective based on maximizing mutual information between CoT and the output for improving CoT monitorability. Across three model organisms with degraded CoT, it recovers most or all of the lost monitorability. Applied to undegraded policies, it further improves judged monitorability, improves prediction of unsafe behavior by CoT monitors and activation probes, and increases the prevalence of consequential reasoning. These results suggest that monitorability should be treated as a trainable attribute of the policy. A dedicated monitorability post-training stage can extend current practices that protect CoT from direct optimization pressure.

Related papers