nu Gundam: a unified framework for point-redshift and PDF-aware spatial correlation functions

arXiv:2610.29116 · astro-ph.CO · Submitted 2026-10-21 · Read on arXiv

astro-ph.CO

Submitted: 2026-10-21

Updated: 2026-10-21

Comments: 18 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Context.

Terminology

Abstract

Context. Photometric-redshift uncertainties redistribute galaxy pairs along the line of sight (LOS), diluting spatial clustering measurements. Propagating full redshift probability density functions (PDFs) through standard pair-count estimators remains computationally demanding. Aims. We present ν Gundam, a unified framework to propagate radial PDFs at the pair-count level while retaining a common interface for exact, compressed, and stochastic projected-clustering calculations. Methods. The code implements four modes: exact empirical-PDF integration, Gaussian-mixture compression, Monte Carlo (MC) sampling, and a quantile-compression method. All modes accumulate pair counts on a resolved (r p,π) grid, from which ξ(r p,π) and w p(r p;Π) are reconstructed. We validate these with DESI galaxies and CosmoDC2 mocks. Results. The PDF-aware modes produce nearly indistinguishable LOS redistribution kernels, while point-photo- z estimates discard probabilistic pair information. Radial uncertainty mainly redistributes the clustering signal to larger π; the depth required to recover the truth projection scales with the pairwise radial dispersion. For practical settings, MC, quantile, and Gaussian-mixture compression reproduce the exact result with fractional RMS residuals below 5%. Applied to DESI Bright Galaxy Survey samples, MC sampling recovers spectroscopic clustering shapes and relative amplitudes for r p 0.8,h-1 Mpc using sample-dependent recovery depths of 400 and 180,h-1 Mpc for red and blue galaxies. Conclusions. Projected clustering with redshift PDFs is a pair-redistribution problem. When propagated consistently, the signal is recovered accurately and efficiently. The integration depth is sample dependent and should be part of the measurement definition rather than a fixed choice.

Related papers