DeclineCraft: A RAG Abstention Benchmark for Jointly Measuring Combined Retrieval and Parametric Knowledge

arXiv:2610.28340 · cs.CL, cs.IR · Submitted 2026-10-20 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.IR

Submitted: 2026-10-20

Updated: 2026-10-20

Comments: 38 pages, 28 figures, 12 tables. Code: https://github.com/Thakur-Atharva/declinecraft-benchmark

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Reliable retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) requires recognizing when neither retrieved documents nor parametric knowledge supports an answer.

Terminology

Abstract

Reliable retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) requires recognizing when neither retrieved documents nor parametric knowledge supports an answer. We introduce DeclineCraft, a dynamic abstention benchmark whose unanswerable questions target Minecraft feature additions after a corpus cut-off, with audits of possible parametric exposure. Later cut-offs support evaluation of future models. Across 27 LLMs, we measure Correct Abstention Rate (CAR; how often models acknowledge insufficient knowledge on unanswerable questions), Answerable Attempt Rate and Answer Accuracy. We find that (1) single-shot retrieval significantly raises CAR in 38 of 40 configurations (model and thinking setting) versus no retrieval. (2) Iterative RAG, in which the model self-assesses its context and can request up to two further retrieval rounds, significantly lowers CAR versus single-shot RAG in 30 of 40 configurations (mean 46.4%), with little change in Answer Accuracy (68.5% to 69.3%). Adding query rewriting and reranking to hybrid (dense & sparse) retrieval lowers CAR for all 12 models tested. (3) Larger models answer more accurately (Spearman ρ= +0.60 with total parameters), but neither model size nor release date shows a significant association with CAR. (4) Without retrieval, enabling thinking on the same weights lowers CAR significantly for 8 of 13 models (by 14% points on average), and the responses shift from acknowledged uncertainty to premise denial.

Related papers