Reinforcement Learning Controllers for Fusion Scenario Development

arXiv:2610.26138 · physics.plasm-ph, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-10-19 · Read on arXiv

physics.plasm-ph, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-10-19

Updated: 2026-10-19

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Scenario development, the design of the waveforms that take a tokamak discharge from breakdown to flat-top, is still an iterative, labour-intensive process.

Terminology

Abstract

Scenario development, the design of the waveforms that take a tokamak discharge from breakdown to flat-top, is still an iterative, labour-intensive process. Every candidate scenario has to be simulated with a controller in the loop, and the classical shape and current controllers need low-level actuator references. So the process is iterative and includes a number of trial-and-error steps. We propose to replace the per-scenario controller tuning by a single goal-conditioned reinforcement-learning controller trained once, in advance, against a free-boundary equilibrium and transport simulator. A scenario is then specified only by the target waveforms of the physical quantities of interest (plasma current, line-averaged electron density, LCFS shape, x-point positions), and the controller produces the coil-current and fueling commands that realize them. We demonstrate the approach on an EAST plasma-current ramp-up: the controller takes over a small limited plasma, ramps the current and the density, grows the cross-section, forms two x-points and holds a double-null diverted configuration against sampled shape targets for the rest of a 1.2 s episode. The neural network controller is trained using TQC algorithm. On 1024 test scenarios sampled from a low-discrepancy scrambled Sobol sequence in 11-dimensional target space, the controller forms the divertor in 86% of the cases, holds it for more than 0.5 s in 67% and reaches the end of the episode in a diverted state in 58%, with flat-top tracking errors of a few kA in plasma current, about 0.15 times10 19 m-3 in density, about 2 cm in position and about 8 cm in x-point location; the failures concentrate at the high-current density (J) region which is believed to be physically or from engineering perspective not feasible within ohmic mode.

Related papers