When Interpretations Persist: Downstream Influence in Gaze-Aware Assistants

arXiv:2610.25512 · cs.HC, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-10-18 · Read on arXiv

cs.HC, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-10-18

Updated: 2026-10-18

Comments: 25 pages, including references and appendix

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: AI assistants may carry forward not only observations but also interpretations of what a person is doing or may do next across time.

Abstract

AI assistants may carry forward not only observations but also interpretations of what a person is doing or may do next across time. Once retained, these interpretations become context for later predictions and system-triggered outputs. We study whether this representation step changes later behavior in gaze-aware streaming assistance. Holding retrieved events, their order, and the target input fixed, we find that Free-form Interpretation amplifies historical influence in both directions: correct histories produce more helpful changes and wrong histories more harmful changes. Unsupported and broader interpretations about activity or future behavior are associated with greater harmful influence. Evidence-Bounded Interpretation preserves distinctions between observation, inference, uncertainty, and temporal scope, reducing unsupported and overcertain content and lowering wrong-source harmful influence while retaining most helpful influence. The same effect structure appears with a second model. These findings identify persistent interpretation as a consequential design choice for history-aware human-AI systems.

Related papers