Learning without Overwriting: Structural Knowledge Fusion for Continual Learning

arXiv:2610.25150 · cs.LG, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-10-18 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-10-18

Updated: 2026-10-18

Comments: 20 pages, 7 figures, preprint

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Catastrophic forgetting in sequential deep learning arises from a fixed-capacity architectural constraint: parameter updates encoding new tasks perturb weight subspaces supporting prior

Terminology

Abstract

Catastrophic forgetting in sequential deep learning arises from a fixed-capacity architectural constraint: parameter updates encoding new tasks perturb weight subspaces supporting prior representations. We introduce the Knowledge Fusion Network (KFN), which mitigates the stability-plasticity trade-off in class-incremental learning through novelty-gated structural expansion rather than parameter negotiation within a shared capacity budget. KFN decouples task acquisition from knowledge consolidation: each incoming task is learned in an isolated lightweight specialist network (2.8M parameters) and integrated into the global model via a Structural Fusion Module that allocates dedicated channel capacity conditioned on a quantitative novelty score. Dual structural isolation--channel-space separation with temporally phased gradient unfreezing--protects consolidated knowledge. On ten-task Split CIFAR-100, KFN achieves 11.94% minimum task accuracy and 71.16% task-10 accuracy, whereas shared-parameter baselines degrade severely: LwF to 9.07% average accuracy (0.00% min), Replay++ to 8.91% (85.08% forgetting), and Replay to 16.21% (73.44% forgetting); KFN's forgetting (57.92%) is 15.5 pp lower than Replay. Furthermore, KFN prevents logit-scale drift, maintaining near-symmetric task performance. Across CIFAR-100 and EuroSAT satellite imagery, KFN's class-incremental retention (72.7% and 42.5%) substantially exceeds the best baselines (29.6% and 0.94%). Crucially, KFN achieves parameter-efficient linear scaling, adding 25% of the base parameter count per step and requiring 25.1% of naive backbone duplication over ten tasks (28.1M vs 112.0M). With a 37.1% peak GPU memory reduction over full retraining, KFN establishes novelty-gated expansion as a practical path beyond fixed-capacity architectures.

Related papers