Beyond Expected Values: Risk-Sensitive Planning with Distributional Monte-Carlo Tree Search

arXiv:2610.23565 · cs.LG, stat.ML · Submitted 2026-10-16 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, stat.ML

Submitted: 2026-10-16

Updated: 2026-10-16

Comments: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) typically stores only scalar mean estimates, which makes it poorly suited for tail-risk objectives such as conditional value-at-risk (CVaR).

Abstract

Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) typically stores only scalar mean estimates, which makes it poorly suited for tail-risk objectives such as conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). We introduce Categorical Thompson Sampling with Optimism (CATSO) and Particle Thompson Sampling with Optimism (PATSO), two distributional MCTS algorithms that maintain finite-support empirical backup laws at Q-edges. CATSO represents Q-edge laws with categorical atoms and Dirichlet Thompson sampling, while PATSO represents them with adaptive particles. Both algorithms select actions using the CVaR of a Thompson-sampled Q-edge law plus a polynomial optimism bonus, and propagate scalar continuation values through visit-weighted averages of child Q-edge CVaR scores. For the finite-depth nested CVaR planning target, we prove an O(n-1/2) bound on the root value error after n rollouts, which upper-bounds the risk-sensitive simple regret. CATSO adds a fixed-grid discretization bias, while capped PATSO adds a tunable Wasserstein compression bias. Experiments on stochastic planning benchmarks show that distributional Q-edges improve lower-tail return and reduce catastrophic outcomes when mean-optimal and risk-sensitive behavior differ.

Related papers