On the tradeoff between robustness and geometric accuracy in adversarial training
cs.LG, math.AP
Submitted: 2026-10-16
Updated: 2026-10-16
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: For non-parametric binary classification in the presence of an adversary, we prove an optimal quantitative estimate for adversarial classifiers controlling geometric accuracy, as measured by the
Terminology
Abstract
For non-parametric binary classification in the presence of an adversary, we prove an optimal quantitative estimate for adversarial classifiers controlling geometric accuracy, as measured by the Hausdorff distance to the Bayes classifier, in terms or their robustness, as encoded by the adversarial budget epsilon. This rigorously shows that robust classifiers sacrifice at most O(sqrt epsilon) or O(epsilon) in accuracy, depending on the regularity of the underlying Bayes classifier. In contrast to prior work on the incompatibility of robustness and accuracy over low-complexity hypothesis classes, our work shows that high-complexity hypothesis classes allow for robust classifiers with precisely quantified accuracy. Our results apply for adversaries determined by any norm on Euclidean space and in both the infinite and finite data settings.
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks