Mind the Gap: Exposing LLM Translation Blind Spots Using the AlphaMWE Multilingual Parallel Corpus
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-06
Updated: 2026-09-19
Comments: WMT 2026 Test Suites Shared Task system paper (accepted). 20 pages, 8 figures, 7 tables
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: LLMs' performance on machine translation (MT) tasks is often dependent on the data availability in the specific domains and language pairs that they are trained upon.
Terminology
Abstract
LLMs' performance on machine translation (MT) tasks is often dependent on the data availability in the specific domains and language pairs that they are trained upon. To examine if Multiword Expressions (MWEs) still set a bottleneck for LLMs regarding language understanding and translation, we report the system performances from the WMT2026 Test Suites shared task, for which we used the publicly available multilingual parallel corpus AlphaMWE as the test suites. We received 31 MT systems' outputs covering English to Chinese (zh), Polish (pl), German (de), Arabic (ar) including Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and two dialectal ones (Egyptian and Tunisian Arabic). We carried out automatic evaluations using BLEU, ChrF, BERT-score to select the Top3 systems per language pair, followed up with human evaluations on the selected systems. Our findings show that: figurative/MWE phenomena remain challenging; automatic metrics sometimes disagree; human evaluation uncovers language-specific errors hidden by aggregate scores.
Sources
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering