Sparse Subspace-to-Expert Sharing for Task-Agnostic Continual Learning

arXiv:2601.17616 · cs.LG · Submitted 2026-01-24 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-01-24

Updated: 2026-10-17

Comments: we are updating the paper with code base

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

The gist: Continual learning in Large Language Models (LLMs) is hindered by the plasticity-stability dilemma, where acquiring new capabilities often leads to catastrophic forgetting of previous knowledge.

Terminology

Abstract

Continual learning in Large Language Models (LLMs) is hindered by the plasticity-stability dilemma, where acquiring new capabilities often leads to catastrophic forgetting of previous knowledge. Existing methods typically treat parameters uniformly, failing to distinguish between specific task knowledge and shared capabilities. We introduce Mixture of Sparse Experts for Task-Agnostic Continual Learning (SETA), a framework that resolves the plasticity-stability conflict through adaptive sparse subspace decomposition into task-specific expert modules. Unlike standard updates, where tasks compete for the same parameters, SETA separates knowledge into unique experts, designed to isolate task-specific patterns, and shared experts, responsible for capturing common features. SETA shares an overlapping parameter block only when the new task's update passes a subspace-agreement test and a sign test against its prior expert; shared knowledge is protected by adaptive elastic anchoring, and independently gated routers retrieve the relevant experts at inference without task identifiers. Extensive experiments across diverse domain-specific benchmarks demonstrate that SETA achieves competitive or superior overall performance relative to state-of-the-art continual learning baselines, improving overall performance over the strongest baseline by 1.1 to 1.7 points on TRACE and by up to 5.5 points on the O-LoRA benchmark, with backward transfer between-2.2 and-1.3 on TRACE, against 4.6 to 6.3 points of forgetting for MoE-CL and 8 to 15 points for the other LoRA baselines.

Related papers