Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization for Long-Form Question Answering

arXiv:2505.09039 · cs.CL · Submitted 2025-05-14 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL

Submitted: 2025-05-14

Updated: 2026-10-16

Comments: 13 pages, 1 figure

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce factoid hallucinations - plausible yet incorrect answers.

Terminology

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce factoid hallucinations - plausible yet incorrect answers. A common mitigation strategy is model alignment, which improves factual accuracy by training on curated (factual, non-factual) pairs. However, this approach often relies on a stronger model (e.g., GPT-4) or an external knowledge base to assess factual correctness that may not always be accessible. Addressing this, we propose Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization (ACPO), a self-supervised preference-tuning method that enhances factual accuracy without external supervision. ACPO leverages atomic consistency signals (i.e., the agreement of individual facts across multiple stochastic responses) to identify high- and low-quality data pairs for model alignment. Despite being fully self-supervised, ACPO outperforms the strong supervised alignment baseline by 1.95 points averaged across Phi-3 and Llama3 on the LongFact and BioGen datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving factual reliability without relying on external models or knowledge bases.

Related papers