Can Decision Models Understand Stance? Evaluating Jev Against General-Purpose LLMs

arXiv:2610.11901 · cs.CL · Submitted 2026-10-08 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-10-08

Updated: 2026-10-08

Terminology

• F1 Score — 6× in this paper · explained in 3 episodes
• Contrastive Learning — 5× in this paper · explained in 5 episodes
• Accuracy — 4× in this paper · explained in 1 episode
• Fine-Tuning — 3× in this paper · explained in 5 episodes
• Generalization — 3× in this paper · explained in 13 episodes
• Benchmark — 2× in this paper · explained in 2 episodes
• Adaptation — 1× in this paper · explained in 1 episode
• Large Language Models (LLMs) — 1× in this paper · explained in 6 episodes

Sources

• Jev for Scientific Decisions: Evaluating Semantic Choices and Their Consequences
• LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
• Can Jev Judge Radiology Reports? Evaluating a System One Model for Clinical Factuality
• Qwen2.5 Technical Report
• JEV vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places
• Stance in Replies and Quotes (SRQ): A New Dataset For Learning Stance in Twitter Conversations
• Same Scores, Different Decisions: Evaluating JEV and Language Models for Legal Document Understanding

Related papers

• Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
• Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
• Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
• MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
• The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
• Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering