How does Adversarial Influence Scale in Multi-Agent Systems?
cs.AI, cs.CY
Submitted: 2026-09-24
Updated: 2026-09-24
Terminology
Sources
- The Ringelmann Effect in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Scaling Law for Effective Team Size
- Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI
- Not All Flips Are Conformity: Decomposing Stance Convergence in Multi-Agent LLM Debate
- AI safety via debate
- Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems
- Smarter Saboteurs, Better Fixers: Scaling & Security in Linear Multi-Agent Workflows
- The Best-Laid SCHEMEs: Coordinated Sabotage and Monitoring in Multi-Agent Systems
- Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents
- Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models
- Revisiting Multi-Agent Debate as Test-Time Scaling: A Systematic Study of Conditional Effectiveness
- Peacemaker or Troublemaker: How Sycophancy Shapes Multi-Agent Debate
- Stop Overvaluing Multi-Agent Debate -- We Must Rethink Evaluation and Embrace Model Heterogeneity
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems
- VSAL: A Vision Solver with Adaptive Layouts for Graph Property Detection