Three Ways Classical Test Theory Can Mislead About LLM Judges
cs.LG, cs.CL, stat.ME
Submitted: 2026-08-31
Updated: 2026-09-30
Code: https://github.com/louisyzhu/llm-judge-reliability
Terminology
Sources
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations
- When Judgment Becomes Noise: How Design Failures in LLM Judge Benchmarks Silently Undermine Validity
- LLM Judges Have Dark Current: A Psychometric Datasheet for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation
- A Coin Flip for Safety: LLM Judges Fail to Reliably Measure Adversarial Robustness
- Diagnosing the Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge via Item Response Theory
- When LLM Judge Scores Look Good but Best-of-N Decisions Fail
- ValueBlindBench: Agreement-Gated Stress Testing of LLM-Judged Investment Rationales Before Returns Are Observable
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: Local-Consistency Optimisation for Bayesian Neural Networks
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks