Reporting Under Pressure: Separating Factual and Tonal Sycophancy in LLM Statistical Analysis
cs.AI, cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-08-15
Updated: 2026-08-15
Terminology
Sources
- ChatGPT Reads Your Tone and Responds Accordingly -- Until It Does Not -- Emotional Framing Induces Bias in LLM Outputs
- Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotation
- What Counts as AI Sycophancy? A Taxonomy and Expert Survey of a Fragmented Construct
- ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs
- When Wording Steers the Evaluation: Framing Bias in LLM judges
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems
- VSAL: A Vision Solver with Adaptive Layouts for Graph Property Detection