Layout-Guided Masking for GROBID: Lightweight Structural Gains in Large-Scale Scientific PDF Ingestion

arXiv:2609.26381 · cs.CL, cs.DL · Submitted 2026-09-22 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.DL

Submitted: 2026-09-22

Updated: 2026-09-22

Code: https://github.com/grobidOrg/grobid

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Transforming scholarly PDFs into machine-readable fulltext remains a bottleneck for large-scale information systems.

Terminology

Abstract

Transforming scholarly PDFs into machine-readable fulltext remains a bottleneck for large-scale information systems. Recent vision-based parsers improve accuracy, but need GPUs and may introduce noise into the extracted text. GROBID, a modular font-stream parser running on CPU, is the de-facto standard for structuring scientific articles and underpins several of the largest open scholarly corpora. We pair it with a lightweight CPU detector localising figure, table, and paratext (header, footer, page number) regions, encoded as typed-area masks whose tokens are routed to GROBID's specialised models or discarded. On two PMC corpora, Bioinformatics (1,926 articles) and Materials Science (2,595), scored against JATS with a section-aware structural protocol, our extension improves over plain GROBID on most metrics (NS +0.025 / +0.013; +0.086 paragraph recall on Materials Science, d z = 1.08), and caption-linked figure recovery improves on both corpora. On the external Table-BRGM benchmark, table detection recovers F1 0.16 to 0.94 and table structure follows (GriTS-Top 0.27 to 0.78, below the strongest GPU system). On body text, against four vision-based systems (Docling, MinerU, olmOCR, dots.ocr), it has the best paragraph precision on both corpora, the best section detection on Materials Science, and a character error rate within 0.004 of the best GPU parser. End-to-end on CPU, it costs 2.7 -- 3.2 times less than the cheapest GPU system (Docling) and 10 -- 14 times less than generative parsers.

Sources

Related papers