Interpretable AI plus Handheld, Portable Retinal Photographs: A Low-Cost Glaucoma Screening Solution for West Africa

arXiv:2609.25697 · cs.CV, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-09-22 · Read on arXiv

cs.CV, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-09-22

Updated: 2026-09-22

Comments: 31 pages, 2 Tables, 5 Figures, 1 Supplementary Material

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

The gist: Purpose: To develop and evaluate an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) framework for glaucoma screening from low-cost portable, handheld retinal fundus photographs in a West African

Terminology

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and evaluate an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) framework for glaucoma screening from low-cost portable, handheld retinal fundus photographs in a West African population and to compare its performance with clinical tabletop fundus imaging. Methods: We used data from a community-based study of 681 participants (1,362 eyes) in Nigeria, comprising 414 glaucoma, 478 glaucoma suspect, and 470 non-glaucoma eyes. Fundus photographs were acquired using the low-cost handheld, portable Volk Viva retinal camera and the Canon CR-2-AF tabletop camera. We fine-tuned component models separately to each device to perform vessel segmentation, cup and disc boundary segmentation, and feature extraction to detect optic nerve head features. A final classification model combined these components to classify scans as glaucoma, glaucoma suspect or non-glaucoma. Feature-weight analysis and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping were used for interpretation. Results: The models performed well on both Volk Viva and Canon CR-2-AF images: Vessel segmentation: 0.98 Dice Coefficient (DC) (Volk) and 0.94 DC (Canon); Cup and disc segmentation: 0.95 DC (Volk) and 0.96 DC (Canon); Optic nerve head feature detection: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.83 plus or minus 0.03 (Volk) and 0.87 plus or minus 0.04 (Canon); Classification model: AUCs of 0.85 plus or minus 0.01 (Volk) and 0.93 plus or minus 0.01 (Canon). Reports for each image, present model decision confidence scores and decision-rationale visualizations to support clinical interpretation. Conclusions: Volk Viva results were reasonably comparable to Canon CR-2-AF in the component models and not far behind in classification. This shows that interpretable AI combined with low-cost, portable imaging may enhance community-level glaucoma screening, especially in settings with limited specialist access and resources.

Related papers