Cross-Bispectrum Constraints from HI Intensity Mapping and Galaxy Surveys
astro-ph.CO, gr-qc
Submitted: 2026-09-21
Updated: 2026-09-21
License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
The gist: Future neutral hydrogen (HI) intensity mapping (IM) and optical surveys probe large-scale structure over unprecedented volumes, offering powerful constraints on cosmological models.
Terminology
Abstract
Future neutral hydrogen (HI) intensity mapping (IM) and optical surveys probe large-scale structure over unprecedented volumes, offering powerful constraints on cosmological models. We study the cross-correlation between the HI IM field and the galaxy density and cosmic shear fields from optical surveys. By formulating the HI-HI-galaxy and HI-HI-shear cross-bispectra, we recover sensitivity to long-wavelength radial modes otherwise removed by foreground subtraction in HI maps, evaluating their detectability for HIRAX and Rubin-LSST. Combining the probes breaks degeneracies in redshift-dependent quantities, including the f - σ 8 degeneracy. Our constraints range from 0.74% to 9.8% on f and 0.073% to 3.5% on σ 8 across the six redshift bins that we consider. Our constraints on the first- and second-order HI bias parameters range from 0.42% to 5.6% on b HI(1) and from 2.0% to 29% on b HI(2), while the galaxy bias constraints range from 2.6% to 11% on b gal. The HI-HI-galaxy density cross-bispectrum measurement allows us to constrain a linear scale-dependent model for the stochastic cross-correlation coefficient between HI and stars, r HI,HI, δ g = r 0 + r 1 k, with a break scale of 0.14, Mpc-1. We obtain r 0 constraints that range from 3.8% to 13.5% and r 1 constraints that range from 7.5% to 19.9%. For cosmology, adding cross-bispectra enhances Lambda CDM constraints, notably via the HI-HI-shear cross-bispectrum. For the w 0, w a CDM model, the power-spectrum-only constraints on w 0 and w a, including Planck priors, improve from (σ w 0,σ w a)=(0.036,0.15) and (0.032,0.12) to (σ w 0,σ w a)=(0.014,0.057) and (0.015,0.059) when adding the HI-HI-galaxy and HI-HI-shear cross-bispectra, respectively.
Sources
- Update on the BINGO 21cm intensity mapping experiment
- LRP 2020 Whitepaper: The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD)
- Late-time cosmology with 21cm intensity mapping experiments
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013
- Euclid Definition Study Report
- Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
- Hydrogen 21-cm Intensity Mapping at redshift 0.8
- HI and cosmological constraints from intensity mapping, optical, and CMB surveys
- Calibrating photometric redshifts with intensity mapping observations
- Inflation and Early Dark Energy with a Stage II Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment
- Combined $13\times2$-point analysis of the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large-Scale Structure: implications for the $S_8$-tension and neutrino mass constraints
- The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Science Requirements Document
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
- Unraveling the Universe with DESI
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation