Correcting Within-Group Self-Selection Bias in Prioritized Replay

arXiv:2609.25297 · cs.LG · Submitted 2026-09-21 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-09-21

Updated: 2026-09-21

Comments: Accepted at the 19th European Workshop on Reinforcement Learning (EWRL 2026)

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Prioritized experience replay (PER) improves sample efficiency by replaying high-priority transitions, usually according to absolute temporal-difference error.

Terminology

Abstract

Prioritized experience replay (PER) improves sample efficiency by replaying high-priority transitions, usually according to absolute temporal-difference error. In stochastic environments, PER can distort the distribution of realized outcomes replayed from transitions with the same state-action pair. We call this within-group self-selection. We quantify the resulting changes in within-group outcome frequencies and mean Bellman targets. We decompose PER into between-group allocation and conditional sibling selection, and derive fixed-buffer corrections that preserve current group-level priority mass: SAMPLE selects a group through PER and trains on a uniformly sampled sibling; AVG averages sibling Bellman targets; and MODEL samples from an empirical full-outcome model. In exact state-action environments with rare high-magnitude outcomes, sibling-aware replay improves learning efficiency over PER, although matched parameter sweeps show that tuning can narrow some gaps. In MinAtar, approximate VQ-VAE groups with SAMPLE mitigate degradation under mean-preserving reward tails in four of five games. Sibling-aware replay thus retains the focus on high-priority state-action regions while recovering their empirical outcome frequencies.

Sources

Related papers