Teaching a Moving Student: Rethinking the Curriculum of On-Policy Distillation
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-06
Updated: 2026-09-26
Comments: 21 pages, 7 figures, 11 tables
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: How many prompts does on-policy distillation (OPD) need, and how does the answer depend on the student policies that generate its training responses? We study these two controls jointly: prompt
Terminology
Abstract
How many prompts does on-policy distillation (OPD) need, and how does the answer depend on the student policies that generate its training responses? We study these two controls jointly: prompt breadth and rollout refresh. A 3x3 mathematical-reasoning experiment fixes 14,080 trajectories and 110 optimizer updates while varying the prompt bank and the number of response-generating policy snapshots. With ten snapshots, eight prompts reach 24.09% average accuracy, close to 24.51% for 14,080 distinct prompts. With responses frozen at the initial policy, however, increasing breadth lowers accuracy from 21.16% to 19.05%; under per-update refresh, it raises accuracy from 23.61% to 25.57%. The resulting interaction is 4.07 percentage points, with a 95% question-paired interval of [2.00, 6.28]. Matched comparisons under two teachers reveal a second reversal: the periodic models have higher short-budget accuracy and answer completion, but frozen-response models overtake in average accuracy at a 32K output limit, using 1.7-1.8x as many response tokens. These results show that prompt efficiency in OPD can depend on both refresh and inference budget.
Sources
- On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes
- Unmasking On-Policy Distillation: Where It Helps, Where It Hurts, and Why
- Efficient RL Training for LLMs with Experience Replay
- $\boldsymbol{f}$-OPD: Stabilizing Long-Horizon On-Policy Distillation with Freshness-Aware Control
- Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes
- Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models II: One Training Example
- MiniLLM: On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models
- JustRL: Scaling a 1.5B LLM with a Simple RL Recipe
- LIMR: Less is More for RL Scaling
- When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning
- A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Models
- Learning More with Less: A Dynamic Dual-Level Down-Sampling Framework for Efficient Policy Optimization
- Not All Disagreement Is Learnable: Token Teachability in On-Policy Distillation
- On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillation
- Trust Region Policy Distillation
- Pass the Baton: Trajectory-Relayed On-Policy Distillation
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning
- Fast and Effective On-policy Distillation from Reasoning Prefixes
- Less is More: Early Stopping Rollout for On-Policy Distillation
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering