A Computational Approach to Measuring Semantic Change in Sanskrit Literature
cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-07-31
Updated: 2026-07-31
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Diachronic word embeddings have become the modern standard for tracking semantic change, yet they have been largely validated on modern, high-resource, and well-segmented languages.
Terminology
Abstract
Diachronic word embeddings have become the modern standard for tracking semantic change, yet they have been largely validated on modern, high-resource, and well-segmented languages. This paper tests whether the paradigm transfers to Sanskrit, an ancient, low-resource language whose phonological fusion (sandhi), morphological inflection, compounding, and polysemy pose a unique challenge. I assemble a 2.7M-token corpus spanning four canonical periods, recover word boundaries with a neural byte-level sandhi splitter and lemmatizer, and train per-period embeddings across configurations. To evaluate the system, I curate a validation set from historical scholarship and test recovery directionally with anchor displacement. Of 21 testable shifts, 19 move in the philologically attested direction (sign test, p=0.00011). I further show which configuration the language forces and comment on opportunities for improvement.
Sources
- Transformer-Enabled Diachronic Analysis of Vedic Sanskrit: Neural Methods for Quantifying Types of Language Change
- One Model is All You Need: ByT5-Sanskrit, a Unified Model for Sanskrit NLP Tasks
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering