Reducing False Positives in Strong-Lens Searches with Generalized-Mean Consensus of Machine-Learning Ensembles in the Kilo-Degree Survey

Context. In wide-field surveys, the main challenge is not just classifier sensitivity, but the overwhelming number of false positives. Searching for strong lenses among millions to bilions of galaxies produces many contaminants, making the bottleneck for follow-up inspection and building statistically useful lens samples. Aims. We aim to improve the purity of strong-lens candidate selection in KiDS DR4 by combining several classifiers. The objective is to retain high completeness for known candidates while substantially reducing the fraction of non-lenses. Methods. We trained convolutional, Transformer-based, and hybrid classifiers, including Li ResNet+, Swin Transformer variants, Swin-MLP, and DemiLensNet. Their probabilistic outputs were combined at score level using averaging and a generalized mean consensus. The models were tested on simulated KiDS-like lens images and then evaluated on real KiDS DR4 lens candidates embedded in a non-lens sample. Results. On the simulated test set, ensembles show no advantage over the best single models. On the mixed real KiDS test set, the arithmetic mean reduces the false-positive rate at 90% completeness from 0.016-0.020 (the range spanned by the two best individual models) to 0.011 for the seven-model ensemble. The generalized mean reduces it further, to 0.007. Applied to the full LRG and BG samples at the same 90% completeness level, the generalized mean reduces returned candidates by roughly 50% for LRGs and 70% for BGs, relative to the best single model. After visual inspection, we obtain 170 new high-quality candidates (24 Class A and 146 Class B), together with 1706 Class C candidates. Conclusions. Our results demonstrate that the generalized mean consensus of an ML ensemble strategy provides a practical route to reducing the visual inspection workload while preserving a high recovery rate of promising strong-lens candidates.