On Emergent Capabilities and Model Merging

arXiv:2609.24504 · cs.LG, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-09-21 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-09-21

Updated: 2026-09-21

Comments: main paper has 8 pages, 5 figures, and 4 tables

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Fine-tuned checkpoints and adapters now fill public repositories, and the most common operation applied to these artifacts is model merging: arithmetic on their weights that assembles capabilities

Terminology

Abstract

Fine-tuned checkpoints and adapters now fill public repositories, and the most common operation applied to these artifacts is model merging: arithmetic on their weights that assembles capabilities cheaply. We ask what this operation does to emergent capabilities: behaviors an artifact carries that were never an explicit training target. Studying two independent testbeds (activation oracles and emergent-misaligned models) across three model families, we find that the answer is threefold. First, merging preserves an emergent capability that both parents carry: merging two misaligned checkpoints retains most of their broad misalignment across the whole mixing range. Second, merging cannot create an emergent capability that is superadditive in its parents: no weighted merge of two single-task oracles reaches the jointly-trained oracle's auditing ability. Third, when only one parent carries the capability, merging dilutes it faster than the trained capability that accompanies it: the gap is significant in most settings. In short, emergent behaviors of an artifact do not compose the way its trained capability does.

Sources

Related papers