The CAMELS-CROCODILE Simulation Suite: A New Cosmology--Astrophysics Playground for Machine Learning
astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-09-21
Updated: 2026-09-21
Comments: 26 pages, 10 figures, submitted
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We present CAMELS-CROCODILE, a suite of cosmological hydrodynamic simulations that extends the CAMELS framework with the smoothed particle hydrodynamics code and the Osaka feedback model.
Terminology
Abstract
We present CAMELS-CROCODILE, a suite of cosmological hydrodynamic simulations that extends the CAMELS framework with the smoothed particle hydrodynamics code and the Osaka feedback model. As a companion to the IllustrisTNG-based second-generation CAMELS suite, it provides an independent implementation of the baryonic physics that shapes galaxies, the intergalactic medium, and large-scale structure, broadening the range of subgrid models over which machine-learning (ML) inference can be marginalized and tested. The suite comprises 25 and 50Mpc/h boxes organized into one-parameter, cosmic-variance, and Sobol-sequence sets that vary 26 cosmological and astrophysical parameters around a fiducial Osaka model. We describe the simulation design and validate the suite against benchmarks and other CAMELS suites. Compared with IllustrisTNG, the fiducial model suppresses the matter power spectrum by only a few per cent, against up to about 27% at z=0, and forms stars with similar efficiency below 10 12.2 M/h but up to 2.5 times more efficiently in group-scale halos, both consistent with weaker AGN feedback. We also present the stellar and black hole bias and the Ly α absorption around galaxies. As a first ML application, we apply a graph neural network trained on IllustrisTNG galaxy catalogs, with frozen weights, to CAMELS-CROCODILE. It fails to recover Ω m and σ 8 and returns overconfident posteriors, mainly for simulations containing more galaxies than any in its training set; within that range Ω m is recovered with an error only 1.5 times the in-distribution value. These results underline the need to train and test ML inference across physically distinct galaxy formation models.
Sources
- Learning the Universe with the 2nd Generation of CAMELS: Varying 35 parameters of the IllustrisTNG model in (50Mpc/h)^3 boxes
- The Prime Focus Spectrograph Galaxy Evolution Survey
- The AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. VIII: Disk Formation and Evolution of Simulated Milky Way Mass Galaxy Progenitors at $1<z<5$
- CROCODILE-DWARF: Assembly and Kinematics of Field Dwarf Galaxies with GADGET4-OSAKA
Related papers
- Apparent Stability in Self-Gravitating Turbulence and the Evolution of Molecular Clouds
- Two sets of potential-density basis pairs for the study of radial perturbations in collisionless spherical stellar systems
- Constraining reionization-era Ly alpha escape with JELS-MUSE: a highly complete H alpha-selected sample at z about6.1
- Deriving volume density profiles of filaments from observed surface densities
- Little Red Dots and Supermassive Black Hole Seed Formation in Ultralight Dark Matter Halos
- MEGATRON: how the first stars can create an iron metallicity plateau in the smallest dwarf galaxies