Preserving What Matters: Semantic Scaffolds Beyond Saturation in Summarization Evaluation

arXiv:2609.22603 · cs.CL, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-09-18 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-09-18

Updated: 2026-09-26

Comments: Accepted at the AIMS Workshop at COLM 2026

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Summarization ships in countless production systems, making model selection a routine decision that depends on measuring summary quality.

Terminology

Abstract

Summarization ships in countless production systems, making model selection a routine decision that depends on measuring summary quality. Existing metrics struggle to support this: ROUGE captures only surface overlap, while LLM-as-judge scores saturate to near-identical values that fail to rank models effectively. We observe this saturation across three public datasets, two proprietary datasets, and multilingual settings. Motivated by this, we introduce Semantic Scaffold, an evaluation framework that extracts a hierarchical representation of facts, questions, and entity attributes from a source text, labeling each as a main point or supporting detail, and reusing this structure as a fixed reference for scoring summaries. From this representation, we derive three diagnostic metrics: Fact Preservation Score (FPS), Question Preservation Score (QPS), and Entity Preservation Score (EPS), designed to reward the preservation of essential information while penalizing detail overload, and position them as interpretable diagnostics that remain informative where holistic axes collapse. Finally, we analyze four recurring failure modes of ROUGE and LLM-as-judge scores, demonstrating that scaffold-based evaluation remains informative where conventional metrics collapse.

Sources

Related papers