Toollery: Scaling LLM Agents to Thousands of Skills and Tools

arXiv:2609.22218 · cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL · Submitted 2026-09-02 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-09-02

Updated: 2026-09-02

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: As LLM agents are exposed to hundreds to tens of thousands of skills, tools, and API functions, full-library prompting becomes costly, slow, and less reliable: each added candidate increases prompt

Terminology

Abstract

As LLM agents are exposed to hundreds to tens of thousands of skills, tools, and API functions, full-library prompting becomes costly, slow, and less reliable: each added candidate increases prompt tokens and latency, while longer candidate lists introduce more distractors for LLM selection. We present Toollery, a training-free candidate-compression framework for scalable LLM skill/tool selection. Following established document-side query expansion, Toollery generates user-intent queries from each skill/tool specification and builds a retrieval index that maps real user requests to compact candidate sets before final LLM decision-making. By treating high-level skills and atomic tools as selectable capabilities, Toollery can be applied to both skill libraries and tool registries. We evaluate Toollery on the roughly 79K-capability SkillRouter benchmark, BFCL-V4 with over 440 atomic tools, and 3,396 proprietary smart-cockpit requests over 220 tools. Across these settings, Toollery keeps online selection bounded to a compact top- k candidate set and improves recall over ordinary specification retrieval. At a fixed top-10 budget, Toollery improves end-to-end selection on the cockpit dataset, and maintains comparable AST Accuracy on BFCL-V4. These results support Toollery as a practical candidate-compression framework for large and evolving agent capability libraries, while showing that quality and cost gains depend on workload coverage and provider caching.

Related papers