AI Should Facilitate Democratic Deliberation at Scale
cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.CY
Submitted: 2026-09-17
Updated: 2026-09-17
Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures, ICML 2026
Journal ref: Proceedings of the 43 rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Seoul, South Korea. PMLR 306, 2026
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: AI systems can strengthen democracy by supporting deliberation at scale by addressing cognitive, social, platform-design, and market-driven frictions, while preserving human agency.
Terminology
Abstract
AI systems can strengthen democracy by supporting deliberation at scale by addressing cognitive, social, platform-design, and market-driven frictions, while preserving human agency. Unlike proposals such as liquid democracy that restructure representation through vote delegation, in this position paper, we argue that AI-assisted deliberation offers a more promising path by lowering barriers to meaningful engagement without substituting machine judgment for human choice. Drawing on evidence from online deliberation platforms and experimental research, we identify four guiding principles: preserving agency and autonomy, encouraging mutual respect, promoting equality and inclusiveness, and augmenting rather than substituting active citizenship. We also address critical challenges, including alignment, sycophancy, training bias, and over-reliance on AI systems. We call on the machine learning community to develop deliberation-focused AI systems evaluated not on engagement metrics but on their capacity to facilitate informed, representative, and friction-robust discourse.
Sources
- Impact of AI Tools on Learning Outcomes: Decreasing Knowledge and Over-Reliance
- WAXAL: A Large-Scale Multilingual African Language Speech Corpus
- Quantifying attention via dwell time and engagement in a social media browsing environment
- The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants
- How Well Do LLMs Represent Values Across Cultures? Empirical Analysis of LLM Responses Based on Hofstede Cultural Dimensions
- Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science
- Democratic Policy Development using Collective Dialogues and AI
- Can LLMs advance democratic values?
- The Basic B*** Effect: The Use of LLM-based Agents Reduces the Distinctiveness and Diversity of People's Choices
- Liquid Democracy or Direct Democracy? One Theoretical Result and Two Experiments
- 'Generative CI' through Collective Response Systems
- Conversation Networks
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models
- Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Polis
- The Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models on Human Expression and Thought
- Can AI Truly Represent Your Voice in Deliberations? A Comprehensive Study of Large-Scale Opinion Aggregation with LLMs
Related papers
- EduGage: A Multimodal Dataset and Benchmark for Sensor-Based Momentary Assessment of Engagement in Self-Guided Video Learning
- EvoDesign: Agentic Editable Diagram Creation via Design Expertise Evolution
- HAGI++: Head-Assisted Gaze Imputation and Generation
- Linking Behaviour and Perception to Evaluate Meaningful Human Control over Partially Automated Driving
- Review of Explainable Decision Support and Adaptive Human-Machine Interfaces for Automation Transparency in Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
- Towards Cognitive Process-Aware Proactive Writing Support