Who Judges Matters: Measuring Family-Conditioned Preference in LLM-as-Judge Panels
cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-09-15
Updated: 2026-09-15
Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Terminology
Sources
- Do LLM Evaluators Prefer Themselves for a Reason?
- Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators
- QEDBENCH: Quantifying the Alignment Gap in Automated Evaluation of University-Level Mathematical Proofs
- Nine Judges, Two Effective Votes: Correlated Errors Undermine LLM Evaluation Panels
- Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge
- Quantifying and Mitigating Self-Preference Bias of LLM Judges
- JudgeArena: A Unified Framework for Reproducible LLM-Judge Evaluation
- When the Judge Changes, So Does the Measurement: Auditing LLM-as-Judge Reliability
- Self-Preference Bias in Rubric-Based Evaluation of Large Language Models
- Play Favorites: A Statistical Method to Measure Self-Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge
- Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluators
- LLM Judges Have Dark Current: A Psychometric Datasheet for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation
- Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering