Towards Detecting AI-Assisted Responses in Online Surveys

arXiv:2609.17317 · cs.CL, cs.CY · Submitted 2026-09-15 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.CY

Submitted: 2026-09-15

Updated: 2026-09-15

Comments: Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference)

Code: https://github.com/mike-qz-wang/ASURRE

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: The use of LLMs to complete online surveys impacts the validity of survey-based research, but detecting such usage remains underexplored.

Terminology

Abstract

The use of LLMs to complete online surveys impacts the validity of survey-based research, but detecting such usage remains underexplored. We introduce an initial benchmark dataset, namely ASURRE, for AI-assisted survey participation to capture usage strategies ranging from full generation and revision to persona-grounded agentic completion. Controlled by these strategies, LLM-assisted survey responses are generated using multiple LLMs on three real-world surveys in different disciplines, paired with genuine human responses. Our evaluation of existing machine-generated text (MGT) detectors shows that naive AI usage is readily detectable, whereas persona-grounded agents that mimic entire respondents push detector performance toward chance. We further show that agentic completion cannot fully replicate respondent-level behaviour and leaves distinctive behavioural traces. While individual cues can be circumvented by targeted prompting, a simple few-shot, training-free aggregator over these cues improves mean AUROC by +0.14 over the best existing detector across agentic settings. Our project is available at https://github.com/mike-qz-wang/ASURRE.

Sources

Related papers