Task-Directed Residual AddUNet:Perfect-Reconstruction Routing for Full-Rate Representations

arXiv:2609.15857 · cs.LG, eess.SP · Submitted 2026-09-14 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, eess.SP

Submitted: 2026-09-14

Updated: 2026-09-16

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

The gist: This paper establishes a perfect-reconstruction (PR) interpretation of AddUNet and its full-rate realization, and introduces a Residual Full-Rate PR architecture for task-directed representation

Terminology

Abstract

This paper establishes a perfect-reconstruction (PR) interpretation of AddUNet and its full-rate realization, and introduces a Residual Full-Rate PR architecture for task-directed representation learning. The survivor--skip structure of a constrained additive U-Net is shown to be exactly equivalent to a critically sampled multirate PR filter bank. The full-rate formulation removes the complementary-subband restrictions of the critically sampled system while preserving PR. A Residual Full-Rate PR architecture is then proposed to progressively route task-irrelevant, nuisance, or redundant structure away from the task-facing survivor while retaining the routed information explicitly. Exact reconstruction is guaranteed for arbitrary shape-compatible linear or nonlinear routing operators, without requiring invertibility, a matched synthesis bank, reconstruction loss, or learned decoder. The resulting architecture decouples representation design from reconstruction design: conservation is structural, while learning is devoted to task-directed routing. The same formulation identifies an identity-shortcut ResNet with its residual output retained as a full-rate PR system. Experiments verify exact single-channel routing of linearly separable factors to machine precision. On TIMIT, the proposed front-end improves test PER from 28.60 plus or minus2.09% to 25.76 plus or minus0.41% with the recognizer and training protocol held fixed, while maintaining exact reconstruction. Speaker probing further shows that structural conservation does not itself imply task-specific invariance.

Related papers