Domain Generalization for Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Systematic Analysis of Components and Interactions
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-14
Updated: 2026-09-14
Comments: 27 pages, 14 figures, and 10 tables
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) models often degrade under distribution shifts caused by changes in users, devices, sensor placements, environments, and acquisition protocols.
Terminology
Abstract
Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) models often degrade under distribution shifts caused by changes in users, devices, sensor placements, environments, and acquisition protocols. Domain Generalization (DG) addresses this problem by learning from source domains without access to target data. Existing DG methods span training objectives, representation initialization, and architectural modifications, but these components are typically evaluated in isolation despite operating at different stages of the learning pipeline. We present a large-scale controlled benchmark of DG for smartphone-based HAR, comprising more than 410,000 experiments across four model architectures, thirteen training objectives including Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM), five initialization strategies, four architectural configurations, and two shift scenarios: cross-dataset and cross-position. Results show that individual DG components provide limited and highly conditional gains. Alternative objectives rarely outperform ERM consistently, self-supervised initialization helps in specific settings, and architectural modifications, particularly Dynamic Domain Generalization, provide the clearest standalone improvements. Joint configurations, however, frequently outperform their individual components and exhibit complementary and sometimes super-additive interactions, although gains remain model- and shift-dependent. Class-level analysis shows that the strongest configurations mainly improve difficult, shift-sensitive decision boundaries. Finally, oracle checkpoint analysis reveals substantial unrealized performance: source-validation selection recovers only 53% and 26% of the available oracle gain in cross-dataset and cross-position settings, respectively. Overall, effective HAR domain generalization requires jointly designing DG components and robust model-selection strategies.
Sources
- HAROOD: A Benchmark for Out-of-distribution Generalization in Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition
- Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization
- Why Domain Generalization Fail? A View of Necessity and Sufficiency
- Towards Generalizable Human Activity Recognition: A Survey
- Domain Generalization with MixStyle
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems
- VSAL: A Vision Solver with Adaptive Layouts for Graph Property Detection