A Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Smart-Contract-Coordinated Federated Learning Marketplaces
cs.DC, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-07-23
Updated: 2026-07-23
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, IEEE Blockchain Conference 2026
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Blockchain-enabled Federated Learning (FL) marketplaces enable collaborative model training among mutually distrustful participants through smart contracts.
Terminology
Abstract
Blockchain-enabled Federated Learning (FL) marketplaces enable collaborative model training among mutually distrustful participants through smart contracts. Although numerous architectures exist, their economic evaluation is typically limited to isolated blockchain operations rather than the complete marketplace lifecycle. Consequently, it remains unclear whether operational costs depend on operating at scale. This paper presents an experimental study of the operational cost of a DAO-governed marketplace. Our evaluation decomposes the gas consumption of every blockchain operation throughout the contract lifecycle, performs ablation experiments to isolate the impact of on-chain coordination and IPFS storage on federated training, and derives an analytical model describing the amortization of deployment costs. Results show the lifecycle of a single training task consumes approximately 3.8 million gas units per hired trainer. The average cost per training round reaches its amortization knee - defined as twice the asymptotic recurring cost - after approximately 20 communication rounds. Moreover, integrating smart contracts and IPFS preserves model performance, achieving accuracy comparable to conventional FL deployments. These findings demonstrate that smart-contract-coordinated FL marketplaces exhibit an amortizing cost structure not because on-chain operations are inexpensive, but because recurring costs are one to two orders of magnitude smaller than fixed deployment costs, thereby diluting over the federation's lifetime.
Related papers
- iScheduler: Reinforcement Learning-Driven Continual Optimization for Large-Scale Resource Investment Problems
- SAMM: Sharded Automated Market Maker
- InferScale: GPU-Native KV Injection for Personalized LLM Serving
- Vigil: Accountable Liveness against Selective Silence
- Steelhead: Interleaving Partially Synchronous and Asynchronous Commit Rules on a Shared DAG
- Pushing CPU Speech Synthesis to the Wall: Extreme Inference Tuning under Serverless Architecture and Billing