LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry

arXiv:2609.11163 · cs.LG, cs.CL · Submitted 2026-09-10 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-09-10

Updated: 2026-09-10

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Structured pruning of large language models (LLMs) offers hardware-efficient compression, yet existing methods require calibration data, gradient computation, or large auxiliary policy networks at

Terminology

Abstract

Structured pruning of large language models (LLMs) offers hardware-efficient compression, yet existing methods require calibration data, gradient computation, or large auxiliary policy networks at pruning time. LILA (Latent-Informed Layer Analysis) scores neuron importance via the Kolmogorov--Smirnov (KS) distance between empirical singular value distributions of the full and neuron-ablated feed-forward network (FFN) weight matrix, providing a closed-form spectral rule requiring no training, calibration data, or auxiliary network. Without any fine-tuning, LILA surpasses PruneNet (45M-parameter RL policy) by 1.57 pp in zero-shot accuracy on LLaMA-2-7B at 25% sparsity, and outperforms WikiText-2-calibrated SliceGPT by up to 6.0 pp across all sparsity levels, while preserving the original architecture. After one epoch of LoRA recovery fine-tuning, LILA achieves highly competitive performance, matching the heavily calibrated SliceGPT baseline to within a 0.48 pp margin across LLaMA-2-7B and Phi-2, despite using zero calibration data. A Neural Tangent Kernel analysis confirms a 22 times reduction in functional distortion versus random pruning, providing theoretical grounding for the spectral importance criterion. Finally, extending LILA to dynamically allocate sparsity budgets via KS-scores yields state-of-the-art generative preservation at moderate compression, while uncovering fundamental single-layer architectural bottlenecks at higher compression regimes.

Related papers