The Truth Was Never Gone: Perfect Aliasing in Compliant-Context Truth Probes

A truth probe fitted where truthful reporting and a task's prescribed action coincide cannot distinguish those targets from its fitting labels alone. We call this failure of semantic identification perfect aliasing. In a controlled binary reporting game, truth and prescribed-action probes fitted on compliant contexts solve the same optimization. On rival contexts their labels are complements, forcing their AUROCs to sum to one; this identity holds across 751 cell-layer pairs to floating-point precision. We separate prescribed output symbols from semantic action using randomized codebooks, then separate truth from prescribed action by fitting on mixed compliant and rival contexts. For a reward-trained Gemma-2-9B policy that answers falsely on all evaluated rival trials, the conventional probe scores 0.006 plus or minus 0.005 AUROC across three training seeds, while mixed-fit probes score 1.000 on the same held-out activations. Mixed fitting uses more training examples and access to labelled rival contexts, so this comparison establishes linear recoverability rather than isolating the benefit of decorrelation. We also show that two compliant-fit probes, both perfect in-distribution, score 0.080 and 0.986 on the same rival activations. The findings concern what a probe measures: they do not establish preserved functional belief, causal use of the recovered direction, or a deployable deception detector. Code and aggregate results accompany the paper.