Dark Matter-Baryon Separability Predicts the Dynamics of an Almost-Dark Galaxy
astro-ph.CO, gr-qc
Submitted: 2026-09-09
Updated: 2026-09-09
Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures, comments very welcome
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We extend the Dark Matter-Baryon Separability Condition to show that the same framework developed for dark matter deficient galaxies naturally admits a conjugate branch describing preferential
Terminology
Abstract
We extend the Dark Matter-Baryon Separability Condition to show that the same framework developed for dark matter deficient galaxies naturally admits a conjugate branch describing preferential baryonic depletion. Using the recently discovered almost-dark galaxy TTT J1237327+143535 as a worked example, we derive a family of dynamical consistency relations parameterized by the unknown progenitor ratio μ i, including thresholds for σ los, M dyn, the enclosed baryonic fraction and the dynamical mass to light ratio. We further connect the separability framework to the expected globular cluster population, providing an independent consistency test of the inferred halo mass. We also provide some bounds on the baryon ratio using the tidal properties of Virgo Cluster. Future measurements of stellar kinematics, gas content and globular clusters can therefore determine whether this galaxy occupies the positive separability branch and also test whether dark matter deficient and baryon depleted systems can be described within a common framework.
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation