SalamandraTA at WMT 2026 Terminology Shared Task: Hard Examples Are Better Teachers

arXiv:2609.09999 · cs.CL · Submitted 2026-09-09 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-09-09

Updated: 2026-09-10

Comments: To appear at Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation (WMT26; camera-ready version)

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Terminology-aware translation asks for more than a correct translation: the output must use the exact terms a glossary prescribes.

Terminology

Abstract

Terminology-aware translation asks for more than a correct translation: the output must use the exact terms a glossary prescribes. The standard recipe, fine-tuning on glossary-annotated translation pairs, hides an inefficiency: for most examples the glossary prescribes exactly what the model would have produced anyway, so they teach nothing about following a glossary. We therefore keep only the examples where the model's own translation contradicts the glossary. In a controlled study at fixed data volume, this selection alone raises term accuracy from 78.7% to 89.9%. The filtered data, built by a two-way synthetic pipeline on open models, is part of the instruction-tuning mixture of our public release SalamandraTA-7b-instruct v3.0, which, used exactly as released and wrapped in a document-level inference pipeline, forms the BSC submission to the WMT26 Terminology Shared Task Track 1. At the official WMT26 evaluation, our system achieves 94.2% term success at 74.6 chrF++, with only two of the twenty-two submissions outperforming it on both metrics. On last year's benchmark, it also surpasses our GRPO-based system, despite being trained solely with ordinary supervised fine-tuning.

Related papers