The Vibe Shift in Software Engineering: Evaluating AI-Led Conversational Programming for Performance, Cognition, and Responsible Adoption

arXiv:2609.09560 · cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.ET · Submitted 2026-09-09 · Read on arXiv

cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.ET

Submitted: 2026-09-09

Updated: 2026-09-09

Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables, Published by International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJASEIT)

Journal ref: S. Aribe & L. J. Labastida, The Vibe Shift in Software Engineering: Evaluating AI-Led Conversational Programming for Performance, Cognition, & Responsible Adoption, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1459-1472, 2026

DOI: 10.18517/ijaseit.16.4.21812

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

The gist: This study evaluates Vibe Coding, an emerging AI-led conversational programming paradigm that enables developers to generate software through natural-language interaction with large language models.

Terminology

Abstract

This study evaluates Vibe Coding, an emerging AI-led conversational programming paradigm that enables developers to generate software through natural-language interaction with large language models. Using a mixed-methods design, the study assessed performance efficiency, cognitive implications, and responsible adoption in comparison with traditional and AI-assisted coding environments. Thirty participants, including professional developers and advanced computing students, completed equivalent programming tasks under three experimental conditions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. Results show that vibe coding significantly improved development efficiency, reducing task completion time by 27% compared with traditional coding and 12% compared with AI-assisted coding. However, these gains were accompanied by lower maintainability indices and higher security vulnerabilities, indicating trade-offs in software quality. Usability results yielded a good rating (SUS = 71.4), while cognitive workload remained moderate (NASA-TLX = 55.5), reflecting reduced syntactic effort but increased linguistic reasoning. Thematic analysis identified trust calibration, loss of control, cognitive adaptation, and prompt-engineering strategy as key constructs. Notably, perceived loss of control was associated with increased security risks due to reduced transparency and validation of AI-generated outputs. Based on these findings, the study proposes a three-pillar framework for responsible adoption: hybrid integration of human and AI capabilities, human oversight and transparent accountability, and context-aware deployment. Overall, vibe coding enhances productivity but requires critical oversight, reinforcing its role as a transformative yet transitional paradigm in software development.

Related papers