Physics-Aware Random Walk Fingerprints for Scalable Power Grid Graph Classification

arXiv:2609.04943 · cs.LG, cs.SY, eess.SY · Submitted 2026-09-04 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.SY, eess.SY

Submitted: 2026-09-04

Updated: 2026-09-04

Comments: power system, power system security, cascading failures, graph classification, random walk fingerprints, physics-aware features

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Recent benchmarks such as PowerGraph provide large collections of power-grid graphs for cascading-failure classification.

Terminology

Abstract

Recent benchmarks such as PowerGraph provide large collections of power-grid graphs for cascading-failure classification. Graph neural networks (GNNs) achieve strong predictive performance on this task, but typically require end-to-end training and model-specific tuning, while their latent representations can be difficult to relate to physically meaningful propagation patterns. Random Walk Fingerprints (RWF) offer a scalable and interpretable alternative, but existing variants primarily emphasise topology and node-level information, leaving grid-relevant operational edge states in the walk dynamics. We propose Multi-Channel Physics-Aware Random Walk Fingerprints (MC-PA-RWF) for power systems, a lightweight graph-level representation framework that introduces physical edge states into random-walk propagation. The method constructs multiple edge-weighted channels from domain-relevant attributes, extracts a channel-specific fingerprint from each weighted graph, and concatenates the resulting vectors into a compact representation. Experiments on three PowerGraph benchmark systems show substantial improvements over topology-only RWF and competitive balanced accuracy against strong GNN baselines, including Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), Graph Attention Networks (GAT), Graph Isomorphism Networks with edge features (GINE), and Transformer-based Graph Convolutional Networks (TransformerConv). At the largest evaluated settings, the node-edge extension MC-PA-RWF+ achieves around 98.04% - 99.32% balanced accuracy and improves failure-class F1 over the strongest GNN baseline by 1.60 -- 5.84 percentage points, with statistically significant gains across all three systems.

Related papers