Cultural Misalignment in Large Language Models: Detection, Measurement, and Mitigation Through Targeted Fine-Tuning

arXiv:2609.04485 · cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CY · Submitted 2026-09-03 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CY

Submitted: 2026-09-03

Updated: 2026-09-03

Comments: 33 pages, 14 figures. Extended version of a paper published in the proceedings of OSSConf 2026, Zilina, Slovakia. Code and data: https://github.com/AntoniCzolgowski/llm-cultural-bias

Code: https://github.com/AntoniCzolgowski/llm-cultural-bias

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: We evaluate three open-weight LLMs (Gemma3-12B from the USA, Bielik-11B-v3 from Poland, and Qwen3-4B from China) against World Values Survey Wave 7 data for 63 demographic personas across three

Terminology

Abstract

We evaluate three open-weight LLMs (Gemma3-12B from the USA, Bielik-11B-v3 from Poland, and Qwen3-4B from China) against World Values Survey Wave 7 data for 63 demographic personas across three countries, using normalized Wasserstein distance to quantify distributional misalignment. Contrary to expectations, no model favors its home country: the Chinese-built Qwen3-4B performs worst on its own Chinese population (W1 = 0.436, the highest misalignment in the entire model x country matrix). Targeted LoRA fine-tuning on the five worst-case personas, requiring fewer than 1,200 training pairs and under 15 minutes on a single GPU, reduces bias by 16.8% for Bielik-11B (p Bonf = 0.002, d = -4.4) with all five targets improving. However, country-level decomposition reveals that fine-tuning redistributes rather than removes bias: Bielik's worst-case personas swap entirely from American to Chinese elderly, with zero overlap between pre- and post-correction sets. To our knowledge, this is the first study to target worst-case demographic personas with LoRA fine-tuning for cross-cultural bias mitigation.

Related papers