Compression-Aware Abstention: Teaching LLMs to Refuse When KV-Compression Masks Remove Answer Evidence

arXiv:2608.29934 · cs.CL, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-08-30 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-08-30

Updated: 2026-08-30

Comments: 19 pages, 5 figures. Accepted to the GroundLM workshop at EMNLP 2026. Code, adapters, and datasets: https://github.com/mali-kh/compression-aware-abstention

Code: https://github.com/mali-kh/compression-aware-abstention

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: KV-cache compression reduces LLM inference memory by evicting context tokens, but when the evicted tokens contain answer-bearing evidence, the model may hallucinate instead of recognizing that the

Terminology

Abstract

KV-cache compression reduces LLM inference memory by evicting context tokens, but when the evicted tokens contain answer-bearing evidence, the model may hallucinate instead of recognizing that the compressed context is insufficient. We address this failure from a behavioral perspective: to our knowledge, this is the first work to formulate compression-aware abstention as a learning problem, in which a model learns to answer when supporting evidence survives compression and abstain when it does not. We construct supervision from compressor survival masks and tight answer-bearing spans, labeling examples as Confident when evidence survives and Abstain when it is removed. A 10.1M-parameter LoRA adapter trained on 2.6K MuSiQue 2-hop QA examples reduces base-model hallucinations by 97% under prompt-style truncation while preserving correct answering on evidence-retaining examples. Unlike prompt-only abstention baselines, which over-abstain on many answerable high-retention examples, the trained adapter learns a conditional policy. We also evaluate the method under actual compressed-cache decoding, where multi-compressor training yields a 6-22x relative lift over the unaided base on evidence-retaining examples. Controlled-deletion experiments show that the learned behavior is driven by evidence content rather than input length alone.

Sources

Related papers