LLM Judges as Raters: A Pre-Registered Audit of Severity, Halo, Reliability, and Version Instability in LLM Essay Scoring on Public Corpora
cs.CL, cs.CY
Submitted: 2026-08-30
Updated: 2026-08-30
Terminology
Sources
- Towards Self-Referential Analytic Assessment: A Profile-Based Approach to L2 Writing Evaluation with LLMs
- Correcting Human Labels for Rater Effects in AI Evaluation: An Item Response Theory Approach
- Estimating LLM Grading Ability and Response Difficulty in Automatic Short Answer Grading via Item Response Theory
- LLMs Do Not Grade Essays Like Humans
- Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why
- Exploring LLM Autoscoring Reliability in Large-Scale Writing Assessments Using Generalizability Theory
- LLM Judges Have Dark Current: A Psychometric Datasheet for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation
- Where Does the Noise Come From? A Variance-Components Decomposition of Non-Determinism in LLM Brand Answers
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering