AI Alignment through a Game-theoretic Lens: A Survey

arXiv:2608.27910 · cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.GT · Submitted 2026-08-28 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.GT

Submitted: 2026-08-28

Updated: 2026-09-01

Comments: This paper has been accepted by EMNLP-2026 as a main conference paper

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: As large language models and increasingly capable AI agents are deployed in high-risk settings, aligning them with complex human values has become a central challenge.

Terminology

Abstract

As large language models and increasingly capable AI agents are deployed in high-risk settings, aligning them with complex human values has become a central challenge. Existing alignment methods, while effective in improving helpfulness, harmlessness, and controllability, often struggle to capture real-world preferences that are context-dependent, non-transitive, and shaped by dynamic multi-party interactions. This survey reviews AI alignment through a game-theoretic lens. Specifically, it organizes recent progress around key game-theoretic elements and synthesizes the literature along three challenges: preference diversity, alignment priority, and temporal dynamics. This perspective clarifies where current alignment methods genuinely benefit from game-theoretic analysis, where the framework is looser, and what challenges remain in building robust, adaptive, and verifiable AI systems.

Related papers