Predicting Quantifiability from Primary Screens to Prioritize Dose-Response Profiling

arXiv:2608.26538 · cs.LG, q-bio.BM · Submitted 2026-08-27 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, q-bio.BM

Submitted: 2026-08-27

Updated: 2026-08-27

License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

The gist: High-throughput drug screening relies on low-cost primary assays to prioritize compounds for more expensive dose-response profiling, where potency is ultimately quantified.

Terminology

Abstract

High-throughput drug screening relies on low-cost primary assays to prioritize compounds for more expensive dose-response profiling, where potency is ultimately quantified. Current screening strategies largely focus on identifying compounds that will confirm biological activity on follow-up, implicitly assuming that confirmed activity will also yield a usable potency estimate. However, confirmed biological activity in screening does not necessarily translate into a quantifiable potency, because active compounds can still fail to produce a reportable dose-response estimate. We therefore present a framework for modeling quantifiability, whether follow-up testing will yield a usable potency estimate, as a distinct triage objective from biological activity. Quantifiability was strongly predictable from the preceding low-cost screen, with most predictive information arising from the observed screening features rather than molecular structure. Response-based predictors remained robust on previously unseen chemical scaffolds and generalized across held-out assay-mechanism families, while the probability of successful quantification varied strongly with response amplitude and assay context. These findings establish experimental measurability, distinct from biological activity, as a predictable property of screening outcomes and show that quantifiability-aware triage can improve the allocation of costly dose-response profiling capacity.

Related papers