Quantifying the systematic impact of differential beam response on the BICEP CMB polarization data from 2016 through 2024

arXiv:2608.25016 · astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.IM · Submitted 2026-08-25 · Read on arXiv

astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.IM

Submitted: 2026-08-25

Updated: 2026-08-25

Comments: 14 pages, 8 figures

Code: https://github.com/jax-ml/jax

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

The gist: As cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization experiments, including BICEP3, BICEP Array, and future BICEP experiments, achieve ever-deeper polarization maps in search of primordial B-modes

Terminology

Abstract

As cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization experiments, including BICEP3, BICEP Array, and future BICEP experiments, achieve ever-deeper polarization maps in search of primordial B-modes sourced from inflation, constraining instrumental systematics below statistical uncertainties becomes progressively more challenging. Since polarimetry in the BICEP telescopes is performed by pair-differencing co-located, orthogonally polarized detectors, differential beam response leads to temperature-to-polarization (T to P) leakage, introducing a potential systematic bias on the inferred tensor-to-scalar ratio r. To mitigate this leakage, the lowest-order beam mismatch modes are filtered out of the CMB polarization maps through deprojection; however, residual undeprojected modes remain. To quantify this residual contamination, we perform dedicated in situ far-field beam measurements of the BICEP receivers during austral-summer calibration campaigns. We quantify the systematic impact of the undeprojected residuals with a specialized set of timestream simulations based on the measured per-detector beams. These "beam measurement-informed simulations" yield an estimate of the false polarized signal sourced by the undeprojected residuals. We summarize the beam measurements relevant to the BK24 data release and present preliminary residual-leakage results for BICEP3 at 95 GHz. For BICEP3 over 2016-2024, deprojecting all six standard templates together with readout-crosstalk templates and their radially smoothed counterparts reduces the equivalent- r leakage amplitude from ρ=(4.5 plus or minus0.7) times10-3 to (1.12 plus or minus0.06) times10-3. We further describe an ongoing program to extend the deprojection basis beyond its historical six modes, guided by a forward optical model that relates candidate leakage modes to perturbations of physical instrument parameters.

Sources

Related papers