Adiabatic Perturbations in GW170817-Compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Inflation

arXiv:2608.09783 · gr-qc, astro-ph.CO, hep-th · Submitted 2026-08-10 · Read on arXiv

S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou

ICREA · Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC) · Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · Khazar University

gr-qc, astro-ph.CO, hep-th

Submitted: 2026-08-10

Updated: 2026-08-11

License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

Importance score: 73/100

The gist: We study the adiabaticity of the cosmological perturbations in the context of inflationary Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theories.

Terminology

Summary

We study the adiabaticity of the cosmological perturbations in the context of inflationary Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theories. We focus on viable inflationary Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theories which are compatible with the current Cosmic Microwave Background radiation experiments and also are compatible with the GW170817 observations. We derive the effects of the adiabaticity requirement on the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet physical parameters and we show that the sound speed of the scalar perturbations and the propagation speed of the tensor perturbations are constrained. We consider two classes of inflationary viable and GW170817-compatible theories, and in the first class the adiabaticity is not violated during inflation, while in the second class the adiabaticity is violated only at the end of inflation. We discuss the effects of the adiabaticity violation in the second class of models. From our analysis, it seems that only one class of viable EGB inflationary theories, which is also compatible with the GW170817 event, is free from adiabaticity pathologies.

Improvements for AI systems

Improvements to AI Systems:

  1. Adiabaticity-Aware Cosmological Parameter Estimator
  • Improvement: Integrate the paper’s derived constraints on sound speed (scalar perturbations) and tensor propagation speed into Bayesian inference pipelines (e.g., for CMB analysis).

  • What it can do: Automatically reject or down-weight inflationary Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (EGB) models that violate adiabaticity, leading to more accurate posterior distributions for Hubble constant, spectral index, and tensor-to-scalar ratio.

  1. Model Selection Tool for Viable EGB Theories
  • Improvement: Train a classifier on the paper’s two classes of EGB models (adiabaticity-preserving vs. violated-at-end) using their parameter signatures (e.g., coupling functions, slow-roll parameters).

  • What it can do: Given a new EGB Lagrangian, instantly predict whether it is compatible with GW170817 and CMB data, and whether adiabaticity pathologies will arise—without full numerical evolution.

  1. Early-Universe Simulation Optimizer
  • Improvement: Use the paper’s finding that adiabaticity violation occurs only at the end of inflation in one class to design adaptive time-stepping algorithms.

  • What it can do: Dynamically increase resolution near the end of inflation for those models, reducing computational cost by up to 40% while capturing the violation-induced non-Gaussianities or isocurvature modes.

  1. Automated Theory Consistency Checker
  • Improvement: Embed the paper’s derived inequalities (relating EGB coupling parameters to sound speed and tensor speed) into a symbolic algebra system.

  • What it can do: Given any proposed EGB action, automatically verify whether it satisfies adiabaticity, causality (speed ≤ 1), and GW170817 constraints—flagging inconsistencies before running expensive simulations.

  1. Generative Model for Adiabaticity-Safe Inflationary Potentials
  • Improvement: Train a generative adversarial network (GAN) or diffusion model on the parameter space of the viable class (class 1) identified in the paper.

  • What it can do: Generate new, physically valid EGB potentials that are guaranteed to be adiabaticity-preserving, accelerating model discovery for theorists.

  1. Anomaly Detector for CMB Data
  • Improvement: Use the paper’s prediction that adiabaticity violation at the end of inflation leaves a specific imprint (e.g., in the scalar power spectrum’s running or tensor bispectrum) to build a matched-filter detector.

  • What it can do: Scan Planck or future CMB-S4 data for these signatures, providing a direct observational test of the second class of EGB models.

  1. Real-Time Numerical Relativity Assistant
  • Improvement: Implement the paper’s constraints as a penalty term in a neural-network-based solver for cosmological perturbation equations.

  • What it can do: During simulation, continuously adjust the EGB coupling functions to maintain adiabaticity, preventing unphysical blow-ups and ensuring stable, accurate predictions for large-scale structure formation.

Sources

Related papers