Radio Constraints on the Circumstellar Environment of the Type IIb Supernova SN 2024iss

arXiv:2608.06716 · astro-ph.HE · Submitted 2026-08-07 · Read on arXiv

Yuhei Iwata, Tomoki Matsuoka, Masanori Akimoto, Keiichi Maeda, Nozomu Tominaga, Yoshinori Yonekura, Takashi J. Moriya, Kotaro Niinuma, Kenta Fujisawa

astro-ph.HE

Submitted: 2026-08-07

Updated: 2026-08-10

Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in PASJ

DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psag093

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Type IIb supernovae exhibit diverse progenitor properties, and radio observations offer a unique probe of their mass-loss histories shortly before the explosion.

Terminology

Abstract

Type IIb supernovae exhibit diverse progenitor properties, and radio observations offer a unique probe of their mass-loss histories shortly before the explosion. We present Japanese VLBI Network single-baseline monitoring of the nearby Type IIb SN 2024iss at 6.9 and 8.4 GHz, spanning approximately one year after its discovery. Our radio observations have detected its emission at 10 and 23 days after the explosion, with subsequent epochs yielding non-detections. Based on the peak radio luminosity and peak time, SN 2024iss exhibits radio properties highly comparable to those of compact-envelope events. Using a synchrotron self-absorption (SSA) modeling, we estimate a progenitor mass-loss rate of about 2.5 times 10-6>M> yr-1 for a compact progenitor wind velocity of 100 > km>s-1. Furthermore, our SSA analysis yields a mean expansion velocity of V sh about 3.3 times 10 4> km>s-1, which exceeds the theoretical shock velocity derived from the self-similar solution by a factor of about 2.4. Even for the conservative upper-bound peak time, the SSA-derived velocity remains larger than the theoretical expectation by a factor of 1.7. To explain this velocity excess, we propose the presence of a confined, dense circumstellar matter (CSM) surrounding the progenitor. The shock emergence from this confined CSM may have accelerated the forward shock, pointing to a highly complex and non-steady mass-loss history shortly before the explosion.

Sources

Related papers