Revisiting the equation of state of dark energy from DESI BAO with SNe Ia and CMB
Jie Zheng, Da-Chun Qiang, Zhi-Qiang You, Darshan Kumar
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-08-05
Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures, 6 tabels
Journal ref: Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 924 (2026)
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16187-w
Code: https://github.com/PantheonPlusSH0ES/DataRelease
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) have recently shown a mild preference for dynamical dark energy over the standard CDM model.
Terminology
Abstract
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) have recently shown a mild preference for dynamical dark energy over the standard CDM model. In this paper, we analyze the w 0w a CDM model using DESI BAO DR2, Pantheon+ SNe Ia, and Planck 2018 CMB distance prior data. To examine how different parts of the data affect the apparent deviation from CDM, we adopt two complementary redshift-cut strategies, dividing the dataset into z<z cut and z>z cut subsamples. We find that the most noticeable shifts occur when BAO and SNe Ia data in the redshift range z about0.4 -- 0.8 are included, reaching a significance of about about2 sigma. Within this framework, the inclusion of higher-redshift measurements progressively weakens this deviation and brings the constraints closer to the CDM expectation. Moreover, the information criteria show no statistically significant preference between the w 0w a CDM and CDM models, while the Bayesian information criterion consistently favors the CDM model. In addition, a parameter-shift consistency test reveals no statistically significant tension between complementary redshift subsamples. Within the DESI BAO DR2, Pantheon+, and CMB distance prior framework adopted here, these results do not provide statistically robust evidence favoring the w 0w a CDM model over CDM. They instead indicate that the apparent parameter shifts under different redshift cuts may be affected by statistical fluctuations and by the limited precision and number of datapoints in the current subsamples. Our analysis provides a complementary redshift-dependent diagnostic for assessing how the inferred cosmological constraints vary under different redshift selections.
Sources
- The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark energy is biased by low-redshift supernovae
- New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa
- Is excess smoothing of Planck CMB ansiotropy data partially responsible for evidence for dark energy dynamics in other $w(z)$CDM parametrizations?
- The case for a low dark matter density in dynamical dark energy model from local probes
- Uncovering the bias in the evidence for dynamical dark energy through minimal and generalized modeling approaches
- Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?
- DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, $\Omega_m$ Tension or Systematics?
- Impact of LRG1 and LRG2 in DESI 2024 BAO data on dark energy evolution
- Does DESI 2024 Confirm $\Lambda$CDM?
- Phantom Crossing and Oscillating Dark Energy with $F(R)$ Gravity
- Hint towards inconsistency between BAO and Supernovae Dataset: The Evidence of Redshift Evolving Dark Energy from DESI DR2 is Absent
- The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints
- DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
- DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars
- Constraints on Redshift-Binned Dark Energy using DESI BAO Data
- Hubble tension tomography: BAO vs SnIa distance tension
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation