Cosmological constraining power of the redshifts, heights, and angular clustering of weak gravitational lensing peaks
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-07-31
Updated: 2026-10-08
Comments: 19 pages, 12 figures (including appendices), submitted to MNRAS
License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
The gist: Weak gravitational lensing (WL) peaks probe non-Gaussian information of the large-scale distribution of matter that is not captured by two-point lensing statistics.
Terminology
Abstract
Weak gravitational lensing (WL) peaks probe non-Gaussian information of the large-scale distribution of matter that is not captured by two-point lensing statistics. We study the cosmological potential of the height distribution, redshift distribution, and angular clustering of high-valued WL peaks using a Bayesian inference approach that mimics a Euclid analysis. We use a forthcoming dark-matter-only hypercube, which varies cosmology in a ten-dimensional space, including evolving dark energy, neutrino mass, decaying dark matter, and the running of the scalar spectral index. We find the individual WL peak statistics to be complementary, as the redshift distribution best constrains the matter density, m, and the dark energy equation-of-state parameters, w 0, and w a; the height distribution and angular clustering are most sensitive to the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum, (10 10A s); while combining the three statistics allows us to also probe the baryon density, b, and the Hubble parameter, h. A comparison to the shear two-point correlation function demonstrates that WL peaks alone outperform the commonly used statistics, while even tighter constraints are obtained when combining all. Considering the 2-dimensional m- (10 10A s) and w 0-w a parameter planes, we find that the redshift distribution outperforms the angular clustering and peak-height distributions. We study the impact of the smoothing scale and find that, typically, the smallest scales yield the best results and the figure of merit improves by a factor about2 when combining multiple scales.
Sources
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
- Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy from Multiple Probes in the Full Dark Energy Survey
- Euclid preparation. XCVI. Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid (CLOE). 3. Inference and Forecasts
- On combining estimated and analytic covariance matrices
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- The Cosmological Parameters (2023)
- KiDS-Legacy: Joint analysis of second- and third-order cosmic shear
- Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
- Comparing explicit likelihood and likelihood-free simulation-based inference for weak lensing cosmic shear
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: optimized $w$CDM simulation-based inference with weak lensing map-level hybrid statistics
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation