Beyond monomial alpha-attractors
Laura Iacconi
astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, hep-ph, hep-th
Submitted: 2026-07-30
Comments: Comments welcome!
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Recent small-scale CMB data show a preference for larger scalar spectral index, n s, when combined with DESI data.
Terminology
Abstract
Recent small-scale CMB data show a preference for larger scalar spectral index, n s, when combined with DESI data. Monomial alpha-attractor T-models can be reconciled with the new observations if the power of the hyperbolic tangent function is p at least 6, where p is even. The supergravity construction of monomial T-models with p>2 relies on the assumption that lower powers remain negligible over the whole field range explored during inflation and reheating. What would be the consequences of going beyond the monomial formulation? As a first step in this direction, we consider the case of a binomial potential, given by the sum of quadratic and quartic terms. When the quartic coefficient, c, is 0< c+1/2 1, we find that the new model displays non-universal behavior for n s, leading to values as large as 0.965 and with an alpha-dependence that is qualitatively different from that of monomial potentials. By solving the background dynamics during the first few e-folds of perturbative reheating we show that the quartic term might dominate before the quadratic one eventually takes over as the inflaton oscillations decrease in amplitude. This leads to a time-dependent equation of state, with w about 1/3 initially before ultimately w to 0. Obtaining a quartic-dominated reheating stage lasting about4 e-folds requires a substantial hierarchy between the quartic and quadratic terms, c about 10 5 for alpha 0.1. Our study highlights that models beyond the monomial form can lead to non-trivial deviations of n s from the predictions of monomial potentials. Furthermore our results for w during reheating call into question the use of monomial models with large p; assuming that w is uniquely determined by the p-th power relies on substantial fine-tuning of the underlying supergravity potential.
Sources
- Encyclopaedia Inflationaris
- Cosmic Inflation at the Crossroads
- Escher in the Sky
- Universality Class in Conformal Inflation
- The Hyperbolic Geometry of Cosmological Attractors
- Superconformal Inflationary $\alpha$-Attractors
- Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
- BICEP / Keck XIII: Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters
- SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field
- DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
- The BAO-CMB Tension and Implications for Inflation
- Refined Predictions for Starobinsky Inflation and Post-inflationary Constraints in Light of ACT
- ACT DR6 Insights on the Inflationary Attractor models and Reheating
- Minimal Plateau Inflation in light of ACT DR6 Observations
- Viability of generalized $\alpha$-inflation from Planck, ACT, and DESI Data
- Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data
- Closing in on $\alpha$-attractors
- Novel CMB constraints on the $\alpha$ parameter in alpha-attractor models
- Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation